| |
Abstract
Twenty-three leopard geckos, Eublepharis
macularius, with a variable clinical history of weight
loss, anorexia, lethargy and
diarrhea were submitted either
intact or as biopsy specimens to the University of Florida
Anatomic Pathology Service. Gross necropsy findings in the
intact geckos included marked reduction of subcutaneous
adipose tissue stores at the tail base and mild thickening
and reddening of the small intestine. Histologic examination
revealed Cryptosporidium infection associated with
hyperplasia and mononuclear inflammation of the small
intestine in all of the affected geckos. Parasites and
lesions were only rarely observed in the stomach and large
intestine of affected geckos. The histologic and
ultrastructural lesions in the small intestine of leopard
geckos infected with Cryptosporidium have not been
well characterized. This report implicates Cryptosporidium
as the cause of disease in the submitted geckos and
describes the range of histologic lesions observed.
Introduction
Leopard geckos, Eublepharis macularius,
have become popular pets and are a common reptile species in
zoological collections throughout the United States. In
recent years owners, breeders, and veterinarians working
with leopard geckos have described a condition known as
"going light", which is characterized by dramatic
weight loss over a variable period of time. Affected geckos
are lethargic and many have diarrhea characterized by watery
white urates. Some of the geckos recover spontaneously;
however, a percentage of the affected animals die. Little
information on the pathogenesis of this syndrome is
available, however it has been associated with intestinal Cryptosporidium
infection.1,14
Cryptosporidium is a genus of
protozoan parasites that infects numerous mammalian, avian
and reptilian species. It is predominantly a
gastrointestinal pathogen, however, respiratory infections
also occur in birds. In reptiles Cryptosporidium
infections are most commonly described in snakes associated
with a chronic clinical course and hypertrophic gastritis.
The purpose of the current study was to confirm that leopard
geckos affected with the "going light" syndrome
are infected with Cryptosporidium and to describe the
lesions associated with infection.
Material and Methods
Animals
During the period between 1995-1999, 5
whole leopard geckos and tissues from an additional 17 were
submitted to the anatomic pathology service at the
University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine for
diagnostic evaluation. Thirteen of 17 geckos submitted to
surgical pathology service, and all 5 of the geckos
submitted for necropsy were adults. The geckos came from
multiple sources including 2 large breeding colonies and a
local zoological facility. Typical histories described were
severe emaciation, weight loss, lethargy and diarrhea, with
approximately 5% of geckos affected and an unknown number of
fatalities. Both breeding facilities were "open"
facilities, commonly acquiring geckos from outside sources
to augment their collection. Geckos at the two breeding
facilities were fed a diet of meal worms and crickets, while
those at the zoological facility were occasionally fed pinky
mice in addition to meal worms and crickets. All of the
tissues submitted for histologic examination were obtained
from clinically ill animals that had been euthanized by
decapitation. The 5 geckos that were submitted for necropsy
were euthanized via intra-cardiac injection of sodium
pentobarbital.
Light microscopy
The entire stomach, small intestine, and
large intestine from 17 geckos were submitted to the
surgical pathology service in 10% neutral buffered formalin.
Representative sections from each organ were embedded in
paraffin, sectioned at 5um, and stained with hematoxylin and
eosin (H&E). Representative sections of liver, kidney,
heart, lung, brain, stomach, small intestine and large
intestine from the 5 necropsied geckos were fixed in 10%
neutral buffered formalin and were similarly embedded,
sectioned and stained with H&E.
Electron microscopy
For ultrastructural examination, sections
of small intestine from 2 of the geckos submitted for
necropsy were minced into 1mm squares and fixed in 2%
glutaraldehyde. Ultrathin sections were stained with 2%
uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate and were
examined on a transmission electron microscope.
Results
Gross Findings
The average weight of the 5 necropsied
geckos was 26.5 g with a range from 18.6g to 34.7g. Grossly,
there was marked reduction in the width of the base of the
tail compared to a normal gecko. Cut section through the
tail base revealed a complete absence of subcutaneous fat
stores. Coelomic fat stores were present but reduced in 4 of
5 geckos. One gecko had complete absence of coelomic fat
stores. In 3 of the 5 geckos the serosal surface of the
small intestine was reddened. The wall of small intestine
was thickened and the mucosa had a red corrugated
appearance. These changes extended throughout the small
intestine but were not present in the large intestine, which
was distended by liquid white to tan fecal material in all 5
geckos.
Histopathology
Histopathologic findings for each of the
23 geckos examined are summarized in table 1. All of the
geckos examined had variable numbers of Cryptosporidium
sp. organisms present on the apical aspect of enterocytes
lining intestinal villi (Figures 1 and 2). In most
cases the organisms were present in small numbers with a
patchy distribution among the intestinal villi (14/23). Less
commonly, massive numbers of organisms were present
diffusely coating villi (5/23). The presence of organisms in
the small intestine was associated with hyperplasia of
enterocytes lining villi (Figure 1). The hyperplastic
lesions were graded as mild, moderate and severe. Normal
villus architecture of leopard geckos is characterized by a
single layer of enterocytes lining the central core of
villus lamina propria. A mild hyperplastic lesion was
characterized by duplication of enterocytes and an increase
from the normal enterocyte layer thickness to 2 cells in
thickness in the infected animals (15/23). Severe
hyperplasia was characterized by an increase in the
enterocyte layer thickness to 5-10 cells or greater (2/23).
Hyperplastic enterocytes were enlarged with vesicular nuclei
and prominent acidophilic nucleoli. Rare mitotic figures
were observed among hyperplastic enterocytes. In some cases,
intestinal villi appeared to be lengthened while in other
animals there was evidence of villus thickening and
blunting. A mild diffuse mucosal infiltrate of mononuclear
inflammatory cells, predominantly lymphocytes, was
associated with the presence of Cryptosporidium.
Rarely, scattered heterophils were identified in the mucosal
lamina propria and submucosa of affected geckos.

Figure 1. Leopard gecko small intestine with
Cryptosporidium sp. infection. Note the apical location of
the Cryptosporidium sp. organisms (arrows); the marked
hyperplasia of the villous enterocytes up to 7 cell layers
in thickness (large bar); and the presence of scattered
lymphocytes among the villous epithelium. H&E stain,
400x

Figure 2. Leopard gecko small intestine with Cryptosporidium
sp. infection. Higher magnification view of Cryptosporidium
sp. organisms colonizing the apical aspect of villous
enterocytes (arrows), hyperplastic enterocytes and
infiltrating lymphocytes. H&E stain, 1000x
Cryptosporidium infection was generally confined to the
small intestine, with organisms and mild hyperplastic and
inflammatory lesions being observed in the large intestine
of only 3 of 23 geckos. In these animals, mucosal
hyperplasia similar to that seen in the small intestine was
present and associated with Cryptosporidium on the
apical aspects of enterocytes. There also were mild
infiltrates of lymphocytes within the mucosa. Gastric
infection was identified in 1 of the 23 geckos examined.
Lesions in the stomach also consisted of epithelial cell
hyperplasia and mucosal infiltration by small numbers of
lymphocytes.
Ultrastructural findings
Ultrastructural examination was performed
on samples of small intestine from a heavily infected gecko.
Coccidian parasites with characteristics consistent with Cryptosporidium
were present on the apical aspects of multiple enterocytes (Figure
3). The parasites were enclosed in a parasitophoruous
vacuole of host (enterocyte) origin. Macrogamete
trophozoites and type I meronts containing merozoites were
identified. The parasites were attached to the surface of
the cell by an undulating feeder organelle, and there was
loss of microvilli on the enterocyte surface at the
attachment site. Enterocytes were piled up upon one another
and had irregular cytoplasmic foldings, increased
cytoplasmic volume, and increased numbers of cytoplasmic
organelles. Nuclei of hyperplastic enterocytes were markedly
enlarged and pale with prominent electron dense nucleoli.
Figure
3. Leopard gecko small intestine with Cryptosporidium
sp. infection. Electron micrograph demonstrating Cryptosporidium
sp. organisms (arrows) attached to the apical aspect of
villous enterocytes via feeder organelle. Organisms are
associated with loss of microvilli and formation of a
pedestal. Lymphocytes are present among hyperplastic
enterocytes. Transmission electron micrograph, Bar = 2
microns.
Discussion
Cryptosporidium is an apicomplexan
parasite found predominantly within the gastrointestinal
tract and respiratory tract of many classes of animals
including mammals, birds, reptiles and fish. In mammals, Cryptosporidium
infections involve the gastrointestinal tract and are
associated with clinical signs including profuse watery
diarrhea, dehydration, anorexia and weight loss. Young
animals and immune compromised animals are more susceptible
to infection. 3 The organisms are found in the
small intestine associated with villous atrophy, crypt
hyperplasia, focal epithelial cell necrosis and mononuclear
inflammatory cell infiltrates. 10
In birds, Cryptosporidium
infections are found in both the respiratory and
gastrointestinal tracts with respiratory infections being
much more common.6,10 Similar to mammals, young
birds are more susceptible to infection. Clinical signs in
infected birds include respiratory distress, coughing,
sneezing, and nasal congestion. 9 The organisms
can be found in multiple locations in the upper respiratory
tract, lungs and air sacs associated with hypertrophy and
hyperplasia of respiratory epithelial cells and loss of
ciliated respiratory epithelial cells. 6.10
Gastrointestinal infections in birds are associated with
diarrhea, dehydration and weight loss. Organisms are
commonly observed in the small intestine but are also
identified in areas such as the cecum, colon, cloaca and the
bursa of Fabricius. 10 Histologic lesions in the
gastrointestinal tract include villous atrophy and fusion,
hypertrophy and hyperplasia of mucosal epithelial cells and
hyperplasia of crypt epithelial cells. 10
Cryptosporidium infections in
lizards, tortoises and snakes have been reported with snakes
being most likely to be clinically affected. 5,8,10 Clinical
signs of cryptosporidial infection in snakes are
characterized by anorexia, weight
loss, regurgitation and diarrhea. In contrast to infections in mammals and birds,
adult snakes are commonly affected and the disease is
usually chronic in nature. Organisms are localized to the
stomach and are associated with hyperplasia and hypertrophy
of gastric epithelium and gastric glands with mononuclear
inflammatory cell infiltration into the submucosa.
Cryptosporidium infections in lizards
are usually subclinical, although disease associated with
gastric infection has been observed in a chameleon. 2,11
Cryptosporidium organisms have been observed in
the cloaca of clinically ill Madagascar giant day geckos (Phelsuma
madagascariensis grandis), however there was not a clear
association between the presence of organisms and disease. 11,12
Cryptosporidium organisms have also been
observed in the ear canal of iguanas (Iguana iguana).
4
Recently, there have been two reports of Cryptosporidium
infection in leopard geckos associated with anorexia,
weight loss, emaciation, diarrhea and sometimes death of affected
animals. 1,14 Coke and Tristan (1998) described
identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts in fecal
smears of multiple animals and histologic evidence of Cryptosporidium
infection in the stomach (1 animal) and stomach and small
intestine (1 animal). Histologic lesions associated with
these infections were not described. Welsh et al., (1999)
described cryptosporidial organisms on the apical surface of
epithelial cells of the stomach and intestine with
infiltration by heterophils and mixed mononuclear
infiltrates. Oocysts were also detected in fecal smears from
affected animals.
The reports of cryptosporidial infections
in the small intestine of the leopard geckos (including this
report), the cloaca of the Madagascar giant day geckos; and
the ear canal of iguanas are the only known reports of
extra-gastric cryptosporidial infection in reptiles. Upton
(1990) commented that the presence of cryptosporidial
organisms in such an unusual location (the cloaca) in the
Madagascar giant day geckos suggested these organisms were
likely a new species of Cryptosporidium. It seems
possible that the Cryptosporidium organisms infecting
predominantly the small intestine of leopard geckos may
represent yet another new species.
The underlying cause of the seemingly
high susceptibility of leopard geckos to infection and the
development of severe disease associated with Cryptosporidium
is unknown. Cryptosporidium infections in mammals and
birds are common in juvenile animals and are often
associated with immune suppression or severe stress.
3,10 In this report the majority of affected animals
were adults. Many of the affected animals came from
intensive breeding operations where stress associated with
crowded conditions is possible. Based upon observations in
mammals and birds, underlying viral infection or immune
suppression are also possible predisposing factors.
Investigation of underlying viral infection or immune
suppression was not pursued.
The consistent presence of organisms
associated with pathologic lesions in clinically ill leopard
geckos suggests Cryptosporidium is the cause of a
"going light" syndrome, which is characterized
clinically by diarrhea, emaciation, anorexia, weight loss
and death in a percentage of affected animals. The
histologic lesions in the small intestine of affected geckos
are similar to those seen in snakes with gastric Cryptosporidium
infections. The presence of organisms in the small intestine
of a reptile is unusual and raises the possibility that
leopard geckos are uniquely susceptible to intestinal
infection or that the Cryptosporidium infecting
leopard geckos is a unique species. Cryptosporidium
species are determined by oocyst size and morphology.
Measurements of oocyst morphology from 11 species of
reptiles suggest that at least 5 species of Cryptosporidium
may infect reptiles. 7,13 Future studies will
attempt to identify which species of Cryptosporidium
is infecting leopard geckos and to determine the source of
infection.
|
Table
1
Histologic findings in the gastrointestinal
tracts of leopard geckos
|
|
| Animal# |
Stomach |
Small intestine |
Large intestine |
|
| 1 |
C+,H+, I |
C++, H+, I |
N |
| 2 |
N |
C+, H+, I |
N |
| 3 |
N |
C+++, H+, I |
N |
| 4 |
N |
C+++, H+, I |
N |
| 5 |
N |
C+, H+, I |
N |
| 6 |
N |
C+, H+, I |
N |
| 7 |
N |
C+, H+++, I |
N |
| 8 |
N |
C+++, H+++, I |
N |
| 9 |
N |
C++, H++, I |
N |
| 10 |
N |
C+++, H++, I |
C+,H+, I |
| 11 |
N |
C+, H++, I |
C+,H+, I |
| 12 |
N |
C+, H+, I |
N |
| 13 |
N |
C+, H++, I |
N |
| 14 |
N |
C+++, H++, I |
N |
| 15 |
N |
C++, H+, I |
N |
| 16 |
N |
C+, H+, I |
N |
| 17 |
N |
C+, H+, I |
N |
| 18 |
N |
C+, H++, I |
N |
| 19 |
N |
C++, H+, I |
N |
| 20 |
N |
C+,H+, I |
N |
| 21 |
N |
C++,H+, I |
C+,H+,I |
| 22 |
N |
C+,H+, I |
N |
| 23 |
N |
C+,H+, I |
N |
|
| N= normal
C = Cryptosporidial organisms present
(+ = few; ++ = moderate numbers; +++ = numerous)
H = hyperplastic lesion present
(+ = mild; ++ = moderate; +++ = severe)
I = inflammation, predominantly lymphocytic
|
References
1. Coke RL, Tristan TE: Cryptosporidium
infection in a colony of leopard geckos, Eublepharis
macularius. In: Proceedings of the Association of
Reptilian and Amphibian Veterinarians, pp. 157-165, 1998
2. Dillehay, DL, Boosinger TR, Mackenzie
S :Gastric cryptosporidiosis in a chameleon. Journal of the
American Veterinary Medical Association 189: 1139,
1986
3. Fayer R, Speer C, Dubey JP: The
general biology of Cryptosporidium. In: Cryptosporidium and
Cryptosporidiosis (edited by Fayer, R.). CRC Press Inc., New
York, NY, 1997
4. Fitzgerald SD, Moisan PG, Bennett R:
Aural polyp associated with cryptosporidiosis in an iguana (Iguana
iguana). Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 10:179-180,
1998
5. Funk RS: Implications of
cryptosporidiosis in emerald tree boas, Corallus caninus.
In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the American
Association of Zoo Veterinarians and the American
Association of Wildlife Veterinarians (Edited by Junge, R.E.):
360-361. Oakland, CA,1988
6. Goodwin MA: Cryptosporidiosis in birds
- a review. Avian pathology 18:365-384, 1989
7. Graczyk TK, Cranfield MR: Diagnosis of
subclinical Cryptosporidiosis in captive snakes based on
stomach lavage and cloacal sampling. Veterinary Parasitology
67: 143-151, 1996
8. Heuschele WP, Oosterhuis J, Janssen D,
Anderson MP, Benirschke H: Cryptosporidial infections in
captive wild animals. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 22:493-496,
1986
9. Lindsay DS, Blagburn BL:
Cryptosporidiosis in birds. In: Cryptosporidiosis of Man and
Animals (Edited by Dubey, J.P., Speer, C.A. and Fayer, R)
pp. 149-156. CRC Press, Boston, MA, 1990
10. O’Donoghue PJ: Cryptosporidium and
Cryptosporidiosis in man and animals. International Journal
of Parasitology 25:139-195. 1995.
11. Upton SJ: Cryptosporidium spp. in
lower vertebrates. In: Cryptosporidiosis of Man and Animals
(Edited by Dubey, J.P., Speer, C.A. and Fayer, R) pp.
149-156. CRC Press, Boston, MA, 1990.
12. Upton SJ, Barnard SM: Two new species
of coccidia (Apicomplexa: Eimeriidae) from Madagascar
geckonids. Journal of Protozoology 34: pp. 452, 1987
13.Upton SJ, McAllister CT, Freed PS,
Barnard SM: Cryptosporidium spp. in wild and captive
reptiles. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 25: 20-30,
1989
14. Welsh RD, Cooper VL, Talent LG: Fluid
urates in geckos. Laboratory Animal 28:17-18, 1999
|